Kimsin sen ?

Kimsin sen ? Nüfusunda yazanı sormuyorum elbet. Şu anda karşımda oturan insanın buraya gelene kadarki yol macerasını merak ediyorum sadece. Sabah kaçta kalktığın, geçen hafta hangi filme gittiğin değil bilmek istediğim. Cevap almak için değil, öğrenmek için soruyorum. O kavşakta farklı yollara saptıktan sonra yolun nerelere düştü, kaç kez kayboldun, sonra dönüp yolunu nasıl buldun, yolda neler gördün, seni şu anki sen yapan şeyleri öğrenmek istiyorum. İnsanlar her ne kadar yollarını kaybetmiş olsalar dahi, senin öyle olmadığını biliyorum. Şu an karşımda oturan insan, buraya kadar nasıl geldi haritası olmadan. Bunları anlat bana. Ve, gözlerindeki o tatlı acıyı, bakışlarını oluşturan sonsuz an'ın sana kattığı duygularla harmanlanmış o kendine has, birbirinden ayrılamayacak olan duygu karmaşasını anlat bana. Oranları değişse dahi... Seni sen yapan dönüm noktalarını anlat.

Lord of Overconfidence : Famosity

Now that everyone thinks that when they post some shitty crap on the internet, like someone getting a birdshit on the forehead or a dog eats its own shit or someone going into a position or situation which is going to get made fun of, i'd recommend instead of posting these craps onto internet websites, just go fucking die in a corner where no one can see or hear you, because i think we all had enough with all the crap going on.

I still don't see how is it funny to make fun of misery of something/someone, I really can't appreciate this kind of humor, if we think where we were at and where we are now, we might feel pity for ourselves. Humor and comedy started with actual jokes that was RELEVANT to actual humor, and it developed itself to the stage level where massively large groups of people can share it at the same time. It was going well till what ? What happened to the real comedy ? What happened to the jokes and performances which did not make fun of anything, but was actually made of fun ? Why should we just ruin this one also as we ruined everyfuckingthing else ? I mean we fucked up ozone, we got this global warming shit on us, we killed each other for materialistic shit, we steal, we lie, we sin, what do we do for good ? What do we have in positivity ? 

Okay, at some point, I accept and agree on the truth that we are all human, and also the wildest animal of this planet, the top of the food chain, the best shit of the best fuck, whatever, but still I do not understand the fact that besides from everything we do/do not, why should we just lower every qualificated item's level to way too down ? Why can't we just leave some things as the way they were as always and enjoy them at their finest ? I mean there should be some privileges to people who really can appreciate them. Like a photographer with a great-mind should be extracting joy out of photographing a visual consept or a view more than any of the rest who aren't actually a photographer with a great-mind. I'm not saying there should be bans for people or discriminating in any means, but I'm just implying that, every person has his/her own qualification for some specific elements, then why to bother being equally equal on everything, because that wouldn't work at all. See, my point is that you can't just go in a carpenter's shop and take his chainsaw and do his work for him, because he's probably way better than you since he is to be the carpenter. 

Alas, I'm trying to keep my mind inside my skull, but it keeps getting harder and harder. I hope you guys can pull it together against all the shit in this world, and keep yourselves off from the crap that is to be contagious, soon enough ..!

The Lord of Prejudice : Narrow Mind

Okay, in every progress of mankind, humans try to take science as a basis for facts, but as a matter of faith science is not taken. I respect all kinds of faith and belief, everyone should in my opinion, cause spirituality is for one. To block any opinion with an other opinion is just a lack of common sense, everything should be analyzed particularly, There is no way to the "truth" if one do not search it within the reality and logic.


How can one understand a fact without solving it's every systematic ? For instance, we can't understand a motor-vehicle mechanics unless we do not start the engine, even if we made it. There could be practical issues in every test of vitality for the matter we created, just like the ideas or thoughts, they could be considered as "matter" as long as we feel them so. However there is always an antithesis for every hypothesis Most of the things going on have two sides, for example, a ball is round because it is supposed to be mobile, also a ball should be round cause it is meant to be mobile. What I do try to imply is that we can judge anything, but we can't judge everything without having points of view from both sides.  It affects anything but infinity, cause we can't have a reflection of infinity, since it's going to the certain infinite.


Every single person has at least one kind of prejudice, because of experience, education, knowledge and mostly religion. What's essential here to set the point of view to start judging. Some are needed to be judged subjectively and some are needed to be judged objectively. If we mix this setting up, then we will have many conflicts and irrational decisions along the way. Unfortunately it's all getting life from "Respect" at its simplest. If one do not respect the other, the other do not have the ability to protect in one's mind. In reality, everyone have their right to protect something or to be against something. Also in reality, sadly we see that people are not even listening to other's thoughts or ideas, but only idolize their own thoughts and ideas against others.


In conclusion, I want to ask; should we just close our eyes to everything and let ourselves loose from the edge of the abyss or should we just examine every element and try to calculate for the best/worst scenario ?

The Lord of Lust : Want

First of all, as I saw stuff and experienced throughout them in my lifetime since now, the most smelly thing I realized was that no one could stand against the powerful gravity of  "Want". It's of course a particle of human nature somehow, but to make it a little more, that's some kind of perversion. I mean, there should be two kinds of desire for this; to want something or to want to want. A specific filtering comes in about this and makes clear of what people want or what they ought to want.

I can clearly use a metaphor that indicates the story of the dogs chasing cars. The dog eventually chases every car that makes a certain noise in a frequency that only the dog can find offensive, and it doesn't stop until the car gets too fast to catch up. So, if I did use my metaphor right, I can actually ask one thing; "Does the dog chase the car because it wants to, or does it want to chase the car because it only wants to 'chase' something ?". I would ask this question because the dog never knows what to do if it is ever able to catch it. 

In conclusion, I have to say that mankind is no different, maybe with the slightest optional point of view, we only want, but we do not get satiated. Which kind of want would you prefer, choose wisely. 

Introductions in order...

Okay, as the caption speaks for itself, I will only try to introduce my ideas to who cares for getting interested in them, I have no intention to bore people out of ideas or anything but I want to take discussions to an another dimension.