Okay, in every progress of mankind, humans try to take science as a basis for facts, but as a matter of faith science is not taken. I respect all kinds of faith and belief, everyone should in my opinion, cause spirituality is for one. To block any opinion with an other opinion is just a lack of common sense, everything should be analyzed particularly, There is no way to the "truth" if one do not search it within the reality and logic.
How can one understand a fact without solving it's every systematic ? For instance, we can't understand a motor-vehicle mechanics unless we do not start the engine, even if we made it. There could be practical issues in every test of vitality for the matter we created, just like the ideas or thoughts, they could be considered as "matter" as long as we feel them so. However there is always an antithesis for every hypothesis Most of the things going on have two sides, for example, a ball is round because it is supposed to be mobile, also a ball should be round cause it is meant to be mobile. What I do try to imply is that we can judge anything, but we can't judge everything without having points of view from both sides. It affects anything but infinity, cause we can't have a reflection of infinity, since it's going to the certain infinite.
Every single person has at least one kind of prejudice, because of experience, education, knowledge and mostly religion. What's essential here to set the point of view to start judging. Some are needed to be judged subjectively and some are needed to be judged objectively. If we mix this setting up, then we will have many conflicts and irrational decisions along the way. Unfortunately it's all getting life from "Respect" at its simplest. If one do not respect the other, the other do not have the ability to protect in one's mind. In reality, everyone have their right to protect something or to be against something. Also in reality, sadly we see that people are not even listening to other's thoughts or ideas, but only idolize their own thoughts and ideas against others.
In conclusion, I want to ask; should we just close our eyes to everything and let ourselves loose from the edge of the abyss or should we just examine every element and try to calculate for the best/worst scenario ?
I truly believe that sitting down with someone who has completely different beliefs and listening to their side/point of view is a necessary action. In return, that person should lend an ear to your views and beliefs as well. Discussion is inevitable, however discussion is healthy and intelligent. The problem with this is though...there are 7 billion people on this planet, all with different views and beliefs. We can only take so much, and we only have so much time. The major question for me is, how do we choose what different beliefs/views to discover? How should we select?
YanıtlaSilI think all paths one chooses are in the area of interest of one. So, if you ask me, in my opinion we need to discover as much as we can, and fulfill our ideas. But of course we don't have that much time neither to discover nor to stock as in knowledge. I don't like to suggest anything but my way is to gather subjects in an area to convert them into a whole picture, like a puzzle.
Sil